Select Language:
A recent controversy has erupted within the tech and AI communities involving a prominent figure from the Ultraman franchise, who has publicly praised GPT-5.5 as a “self-isolated genius.” The endorsement has sparked widespread discussion and criticism, leading a group of 16 experts to rapidly withdraw their support for Claude, a competing AI platform.
The endorsement came unexpectedly when a well-known Ultraman personality took to social media, praising GPT-5.5’s advanced capabilities and calling it a “self-isolated genius”—a term that has drawn mixed reactions from industry insiders and fans alike. This unusual label seemed to echo the AI’s complex and somewhat enigmatic nature, but it also raised eyebrows due to its seemingly introspective connotations.
However, the praise quickly backfired among some experts who viewed it as an unwarranted endorsement that could skew public perception. Within hours, a team of 16 AI researchers and developers announced their decision to revoke support for Claude, a rival AI model. According to insider sources, the team cited concerns about the potential for bias and the need for more transparent evaluation standards, especially in light of the Ultraman figure’s influential judgment.
This swift withdrawal underscores ongoing tensions within the AI community regarding endorsement and credibility. Many argue that celebrity endorsements, especially from influential figures in unrelated fields, can significantly impact public trust—sometimes for the worse—if not carefully vetted.
While the Ultraman personality’s comments may have been meant as a compliment, the incident highlights the delicate balance between public admiration and responsible advocacy within rapidly evolving tech sectors. As AI companies continue to push the boundaries of innovation, the importance of unbiased, transparent evaluation remains at the forefront of industry discussions.
The incident also raises broader questions about the role of celebrities and public figures in shaping technological narratives and the potential consequences when their opinions inadvertently influence industry dynamics. For now, the AI community remains watchful, emphasizing the need for independent, rigorous assessments over celebrity-led endorsements.



