Select Language:
AI search appears quick and intelligent, providing answers within seconds and sounding very convincing. However, this polished delivery can hide significant flaws that you’ll soon realize.
One of the most misleading aspects of AI search is how convincingly wrong it can be. The responses flow smoothly, the tone seems confident, and the facts are often presented neatly. This sleek presentation can make even the most bizarre or inaccurate claims sound plausible. For instance, in June 2025, the New York Post reported how Google’s AI Overview suggested users add glue to pizza sauce—a strange and unsafe recommendation that still managed to appear credible.
Studies have shown that over half of AI-generated advice about life insurance can be misleading or outright incorrect. Some answers about Medicare contained errors that could have cost individuals thousands. Unlike traditional search results, which display multiple sources for comparison, AI condenses everything into a single narrative. If that narrative is based on faulty data or assumptions, the errors aren’t readily obvious—they’re hidden behind convincing language. This makes AI answers appear trustworthy, even when they’re not, which is why I believe AI search will never fully replace classic search engines like Google.
AI tools aim to provide clear, concise answers, but this often means only a fraction of the available information is shown. Traditional search results list multiple sources, making it easier to identify differences or missing perspectives. In contrast, AI combines bits of information into one streamlined response, rarely showing what’s been left out. This can be harmless with straightforward topics but becomes risky with complex or controversial issues. Critical viewpoints might be omitted because of safety filters, or newer studies that challenge older data might be excluded, leading to a distorted understanding of the truth.
Since AI synthesizes information from various sources, it is inherently vulnerable to misinformation and manipulation. If falsehoods or biased content are prevalent in the training data, AI may inadvertently perpetuate those errors as facts. Additionally, malign actors can intentionally feed misleading information into the data sources, skewing the AI’s responses over time. For example, during the July 2025 tsunami scare in the Pacific, some AI assistants provided false safety updates, with Grok mistakenly telling Hawaii residents a warning had ended when it hadn’t, risking lives.
AI doesn’t form independent opinions; it reflects the biases present in its training data. Overrepresented viewpoints can dominate its answers, while underrepresented ones may disappear. Some biases are subtle, affecting the tone or focus of responses, but others are more obvious. A study by the London School of Economics, reported by The Guardian, found that AI used by English councils downplayed women’s health issues, describing similar cases as less urgent for women than for men—even when women’s conditions were worse.
The responses you receive can also depend on what the system thinks it knows about you. Factors like your location, language, or even how you phrase your questions can influence the answer. Some AI tools, like ChatGPT, personalize responses based on past interactions, which means your answers might be tailored to your perceived preferences. While personalization can be convenient for local weather or news, it can also create a “filter bubble,” subtly limiting your exposure to diverse perspectives. You never see the opposing or missing viewpoints because they’re filtered out, making it hard to know whether you’re seeing the full picture.
Many AI platforms admit to storing conversations, but what’s less obvious is that human reviewers may examine these chats to improve the system. Google’s Gemini privacy policy states that “humans review some saved chats,” so sensitive or personal information shared during interactions might be seen, stored, or used in ways you don’t anticipate. Even if you disable certain privacy settings, you’re trusting that the platform will honor your choices. To stay safe, it’s best to avoid sharing private or sensitive details in AI chats altogether.
When relying on AI answers, you’re ultimately responsible for how you use the information. If the response is incorrect and you incorporate it into a report, business plan, or social media post, you bear the consequences—not the AI. Real-world mishaps exist, such as a false claim by ChatGPT linking a university professor to a scandal, which led to a potential defamation case because the AI fabricated the story convincingly. Courts and employers won’t accept “the AI told me so” as an excuse. Always fact-check and verify sources before acting on AI-generated content, as the stakes can be high, and errors can have serious repercussions.
AI search can be a helpful tool for quick research and idea generation, but it’s not infallible. Sometimes it provides reliable answers; other times, flawed or incomplete ones. Used thoughtfully, it speeds up learning and sparks creativity. Used carelessly, it can mislead, compromise your privacy, and leave you accountable for its mistakes.
Add us on ChatGPT
Add us on Perplexity
