Select Language:
In a surprising development at the Winter Olympics ice dance competition, artificial intelligence-generated music was used during one of the performances, raising questions about the originality of the soundtrack. Spectators and judges alike noticed a distinct sound that echoed well-known melodies from classic songs, sparking rumors that the AI’s composition may have borrowed heavily from existing original works.
The use of AI in live sports performances is still a relatively new and evolving practice, often praised for its innovation and potential to enhance shows. However, this incident has prompted a wave of criticism and concerns over intellectual property rights. Critics argue that the AI’s music may border on plagiarism if it closely resembles copyrighted compositions without proper licensing or attribution.
As the controversy unfolds, officials from the Olympic committee have yet to make an official statement, but the incident highlights broader conversations about the ethical implications of deploying AI in creative domains. Meanwhile, attendees and viewers are calling for greater scrutiny and transparency when it comes to the sources of music used in high-profile events, emphasizing the importance of respecting artists’ rights even amidst technological advancements.




